Special Agent Entrance Practice Exam

To determine whether Jake completed more investigations than Rob, the key is to compare the data reflecting their respective numbers of investigations. If the information provided indicates that Jake's total was higher than Rob's, then the answer is indeed that yes, Jake completed more investigations than Rob.

In scenarios involving quantitative comparisons, it's essential to have clear data points. If the question is grounded in specific investigative numbers or a timeline suggesting Jake's investigations were consistently greater, that forms a basis for affirming that he indeed surpassed Rob in terms of completion. The context might include relative performance metrics or direct counts illustrating Jake’s superiority in this respect.

Other options suggest different perspectives: stating that Rob had more investigations would contradict the affirmative assertion, suggesting a stalemate would imply equal performances, while insufficient information would indicate that the data provided do not clarify their respective counts. Therefore, if there is detailed evidence showing Jake's counts are higher, affirming the statement is justified.