Special Agent Entrance Practice Exam

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards

From $12.50Unlock all

Session length

1 / 20

If Mark completed more investigations than Jake and Jake completed more than Rob, what can be concluded about Mark and Rob?

Mark completed more than Rob

The conclusion that Mark completed more investigations than Rob is drawn from the relationship established among their performance. Since it is stated that Mark completed more investigations than Jake, and Jake completed more than Rob, we can infer a direct comparison among all three individuals.

To break it down:

- Mark's number of investigations exceeds Jake's.

- Jake's number of investigations exceed Rob's.

This establishes a clear order: Mark > Jake > Rob. Therefore, it logically follows that Mark's number must also exceed Rob's, leading to the conclusion that Mark completed more investigations than Rob. This relational structure only supports the conclusion that Mark has the highest count among the three, making it possible to confirm that option A is indeed correct.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Rob completed more than Mark

They completed the same number

Insufficient Information to Decide